Featured Post

It seems Pope Francis needs to brush up on his Tertullian!

It has been reported (in The ChristLast Media, I must note) that the current Pope does not like the phrase "lead us not into temptation...

"Let no freedom be allowed to novelty, because it is not fitting that any addition should be made to antiquity. Let not the clear faith and belief of our forefathers be fouled by any muddy admixture." -- Pope Sixtus III

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Joe Sobran on, of all things, Michael Jackson.

(Note: The link above will take you to Joe's current on-line column. The archive is here. Not all of his past columns are available in the archive.)

What I like about Mr. Sobran's columns is their orthodox Catholic layman's perspective.

Of course there are worse sins than homosexuality and child molesting. But Joe should take a look at this culture as a whole and see where it is being pushed.

When an individual commits a mortal sin, it is a terrible thing. But what do we call it when the same sin is society-wide?

If a man's sins had no effect on his family, neighbors, friends, city, nation, or culture, we would not have to worry much would we? Too bad, so sad; he goes to hell if he does not repent, confess, and receive absolution and the rest of us go on our merry way.

But that is not Catholicism. We are families, neighborhoods, parishes, dioceses, nations...communities. Even (maybe especially?) the unbelievers belong. Is the living organism analogy out of place here? I don't think so.

As the prosecution brought lurid testimony against Jacko, I asked myself how I might be made to look if the government could invite, or force, all the acquaintances I’ve ever made to testify against me. The truth would be bad enough; but add to that the lies that my enemies would be glad to repeat, and which the public would be willing to believe, and even an acquittal wouldn’t do much to repair the damage.

In Jacko’s case, of course, there’s a special angle. Child molesting is one of those things — like flag burning, pot smoking, and Holocaust denial — that cause some people to freak out. It’s not enough to say you’re against them; if you oppose them with anything less than hysteria, some readers are sure to assume you favor them. One of the things writing for a living teaches you is that, no matter how clearly you think you’ve written, people may read the most bizarre things into your work, clean opposite to what you’ve actually said.

I used to freak over child molesting myself. I once suspected a houseguest of having lewd designs on my grandson, though I couldn’t prove it, so I invented a feeble pretext for requiring him to leave. On another occasion an in-law was convicted of sodomizing boys.

To my surprise, I found myself unable to dislike or despise either man. I pitied them both. They were afflicted with a temptation God had spared me. Imagine living with an illicit desire so vehemently condemned by society!

This is the part where some people would no doubt condemn discrimination against child molesters — or “pedophilic Americans,” as they’d no doubt call them. And this is just where I think it’s important to keep a difficult balance and sense of proportion between sin and sinner.

Child molesting is a serious sin. Even liberals don’t make light of it. But it’s the prevalent hysteria on the subject that gives me pause. By all means, children should be protected from it; I’ve also known kids whose lives were terribly damaged by it (girls, I think, more than boys). And yet others seem to suffer no permanent or irreparable harm. The vice has been commonly accepted in some civilizations, and most of their members seem to have been pretty normal.

St. Thomas Aquinas held that most sexual sins were mortal, since they abuse our life-giving faculties, yet also that they were less serious than other mortal sins, because they are merely carnal, not spiritual. Of course they may be more grave when they also involve infidelity, seduction, and betrayal, which are not merely sins of the flesh, but offenses against justice, charity, and other duties.

Today some people openly defend pedophilia, and no doubt many others secretly approve of it. This shouldn’t surprise us. American culture, once notoriously puritanical, now contemns the virtue of chastity, and if Michael Jackson had made a reputation for collecting women, he’d be widely admired in the same publications that now want to stone him.

But when he’s suspected of collecting boys — a suspicion he’s done little to discourage — even liberals become raging Puritans. Jacko must be wondering what the rules are in this country nowadays. Hugh Hefner, our senior philosopher, has never explained why, if sexual pleasure is essentially good, it’s depraved when enjoyed with children.

We no longer recognize anything as a sin, but we still want to have our public sinners. Stoning them is so much fun.

No comments:

About Me

My photo
First of all, the word is SEX, not GENDER. If you are ever tempted to use the word GENDER, don't. The word is SEX! SEX! SEX! SEX! For example: "My sex is male." is correct. "My gender is male." means nothing. Look it up. What kind of sick neo-Puritan nonsense is this? Idiot left-fascists, get your blood-soaked paws off the English language. Hence I am choosing "male" under protest.

Labels

Blog Archive