Featured Post

It seems Pope Francis needs to brush up on his Tertullian!

It has been reported (in The ChristLast Media, I must note) that the current Pope does not like the phrase "lead us not into temptation...

"Let no freedom be allowed to novelty, because it is not fitting that any addition should be made to antiquity. Let not the clear faith and belief of our forefathers be fouled by any muddy admixture." -- Pope Sixtus III

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Buchanan: Repansycans, economic utopianism, and slave China.

At WorldNetDaily, Pat Buchanan ponders the magical, mystical ideology of free trade.

George Bush's free-trade ideology appears to be colliding more and more not only with his political interests, but also with U.S. national interests.
Nothing has brought this into sharper focus than China's $18.5 billion bid to snatch the U.S. oil company Unocal away from Chevron.

In making the offer, Beijing is playing by the rules of the game as the Bush Republicans have written them. Why, then, should we object?

To the evangelists of the Global Economy, U.S. interests and world peace are both advanced by the unimpeded flow of investments, jobs, goods, technology and people across national frontiers. It does not matter who produces the goods or who controls the factors of production. Trade deficits do not matter. They are the concern only of protectionists who do not understand the brave new world of Davos.

The Chinese, however, are Hamiltonians – resolute and ruthless economic nationalists. They look out and see the same world our forefathers saw, a world of nation-states where the struggle for power and pre-eminence is eternal, where trade is not a game, but an arena of battle, where industrial and technological primacy eventually yield military and strategic supremacy, where those who sacrifice today rule the world tomorrow.

They see the world as it is. We see the world as we would like it to be.
The Chinese do not waste time reading 19th-century utopians like Ricardo, Cobden, Bastiat and Mill. If they read an economist, it is Friedrich List, who put production ahead of consumption. To the Chinese, it is acceptable that we should consume most of the apples today if, tomorrow, they control the orchard.

For a quarter century, U.S. policy has been rooted in the belief that trade between nations means peace between nations, that by giving China unrestricted access to U.S. markets, we will moderate that regime and create a Chinese middle class that will democratize the country.

China has seized the offer. In 1994, Beijing tied its currency, the renminbi, to the dollar at eight to one and held it there as the dollar fell. By keeping its currency cheap and wages low, and by offering global companies lax regulations, low taxes and an inexhaustible supply of cheap but competent labor, China has converted herself into a manufacturing marvel where economic growth has averaged 9 percent a year for a decade.

Last year, China ran a trade surplus with us of $162 billion, the largest in history. Almost half of that amount was attributable to China's surplus in trade in electrical equipment and computers. Since June 1995, the cumulative U.S. trade deficit with China is nearly $900 billion.

What has China done with the hoard? Bought T-bills to give her a claim on all future interest payments on the U.S. debt, begun to buy up companies like Unocal, Maytag and IBM's PC business, and bought weapons from Israel and Russia to prepare for the ultimate showdown with the United States.

No comments:

About Me

My photo
First of all, the word is SEX, not GENDER. If you are ever tempted to use the word GENDER, don't. The word is SEX! SEX! SEX! SEX! For example: "My sex is male." is correct. "My gender is male." means nothing. Look it up. What kind of sick neo-Puritan nonsense is this? Idiot left-fascists, get your blood-soaked paws off the English language. Hence I am choosing "male" under protest.

Labels

Blog Archive