Featured Post

SEX IS DEATH [Part 95: Sexual perversion - the sin that keeps on taking and taking and taking...ad nauseum...ad infinitum]

Not literally ad infinitum , of course. All of us will have to pay the price one day. You remember Jerry Sandusky, [ In Plain View - The...

TheChurchMilitant

"Let no freedom be allowed to novelty, because it is not fitting that any addition should be made to antiquity. Let not the clear faith and belief of our forefathers be fouled by any muddy admixture." -- Pope Sixtus III

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

I get mail from sub-continental pimps...

Once in a while, I get something interesting in my dacha's inbox. You know, something other than the everyday fascist hate. Check  out this "comment"...


[Of course I don't mean you should avail yourself of the services of prostitutes when visiting India. I mean..oh, heck, you figure it out. Indian girls sure are pretty, though...]
Aahna Desai said...

Bangalore Escorts Services
Bangalore Escorts Services
Bangalore Escorts Services
Bangalore Escorts Services
Jodhpur Call Girl Service



...about my post entitled...

Forget that Princess Leia nonsense, real men love Wonder Woman. [Part One

I didn't know Wonder Woman was big in India.


The previous post is my attempt to reach the other side of the family.

TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.

Fyodor ha pietà Orange Messia e offre consigli su come trattare con i suoi cugini russi idiota e diventare un vero uomo ..

Mi scuso, miei cari cugini italiani,
per questa traduzione imbarazzante. È possibile dare la colpa
di Google Translate e il fatto che io sono due generazioni
rimosse dall 'Italia.

Ecco il magro su Russia, bimbi.

I russi sono sempre stati schiavi e rimarrà tale fino ad oggi. Non hanno esperienza con la libertà di qualsiasi tipo, non parola, di riunione, la stampa, o anche la religione. Nessuna.


Non capiscono la responsabilità personale, i diritti di proprietà, o il concetto di stato di diritto.


I miei poveri cugini russi sono stati afflitto e oppresso per tutta la loro storia da teppisti brutali, ignoranti, e assetati di sangue che si facevano chiamare i capi macellati e chiunque osasse resistere a loro. Non importa se questi pazzi e pazze si chiamavano monarchi divine-destra o l'avanguardia della storia. Il risultato è sempre stato lo stesso per la povera Madre Russia. Lei ha conosciuto altro che la povertà, la schiavitù, l'orrore e la morte su una scala senza precedenti.


Mentre io sono a esso, vorrei cogliere questa occasione per prendere un colpo alla Chiesa ortodossa russa, che ha, con poche eccezioni, ha collaborato con i macellai e voltato le spalle innocenti. vergogna eterna è la sua ricompensa.


Nonostante tutto questo, il popolo russo hanno sopportato, e la causa della loro storia orribile, credo che hanno prodotto la più grande letteratura che il mondo abbia mai visto, da Gogol a Solzenicyn e oltre. A questo si aggiunge una bella architettura, musica incredibile, e alcune delle donne più belle del mondo. Si può solo chiedersi e piangere sulle meraviglie Russia avrebbe dato all'umanità se solo fosse stata libera.


Che cosa significa la questione alla clumpy il Clown? Niente di niente. Come potrebbe un thingee ignorante che si preoccupa solo il suo stomaco, il suo conto in banca, e le sue piccole, genitali appassiti fregarmene dei propri cittadini, tanto meno gli oppressi dall'altra parte del mondo?


Semplice. Non può.


Czarina Putinesca e il suo scagnozzo non sono altro che criminali. Pensano come criminali e si comportano come dei criminali.

Capiscono solo il potere, perché è il loro dio. Rispettano il potere solo perché temono solo la perdita dei loro propri.

The Orange Pansy voglia condannare la marina americana per spruzzare il prossimo caccia russo che ottiene nel raggio d'azione delle armi di qualsiasi nave da guerra degli Stati Uniti e il coraggio le bambine codardi del Cremlino per cercare di fare qualcosa al riguardo.


Ma non lo farà.


E 'altrettanto debole e effeminati come i teppisti russi i cui stivali [e "qualunque" cosa si può ottenere la sua lingua su] ama leccare così tanto.


Si dovrebbe andare sopra le teste dei leader autoproclamati della Russia e twittare direttamente al popolo russo e insegnare loro che la Russia appartiene a loro, non i loro schiavi padroni.


Questo non accadrà neanche, bimbi, perché richiederebbe un vero uomo la cui coscienza e l'umanità non sono stati sistematicamente soffocato da decenni di avidità, lussuria, furto, e l'ignoranza volontaria. Nessun uomo del genere è nemmeno lontanamente il potere nel nostro paese, sia ...


Il nostro peccato è questa: Una volta abbiamo avuto il potere per risolvere questo tipo di problema, ma non è più. Mentre i miei cugini russi non hanno mai assaggiato la libertà, abbiamo venduto la nostra incredibilmente a buon mercato.


Nessuno al mondo guarda all'America con speranza. Vengono qui solo per sesso ed essere sul reality show.


Che il Padre, il Figlio e lo Spirito Santo abbi pietà di tutte le anime. Siamo sicuri come l'Inferno avrà bisogno.


TheChurchMilitant: A volte anti-sociali, ma sempre antifascista dal 2005.

John Martignoni attempts to help a lost soul find his way home.

Stay tuned for the next few weeks because Mr. Martignoni, of the Bible Christian Society, knows his stuff and can explain the Truth to anyone with an open mind and an open heart.



 If this newsletter  was forwarded to you by a friend, and you would like to be added to our distribution list, all you have to do is go to  http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/newsletter and put your email address in the box at the top of the page.   Either way, it will take you about 10 seconds.

Okay, here's the background story for this week's newsletter - and the newsletters for the next few weeks as well. As many of you know, I have a Facebook page - John Martignoni and the Bible Christian Society (if you haven't joined, please do so - lots of good discussions on there). Well, this guy, Tony Thorne, from somewhere in Maine, who has a degree in biblical studies of some sort from Evangel University (Assemblies of God denomination), apparently joined the FB group thinking, "Cool, a society of Bible Christians." Well, he eventually realized that the Bible Christian Society is basically a Catholic group, so he posted - his one and only post up to that time - with something along the lines of: "I am so sorry I joined this group of people who are in a satanic cult that hates the Word of God and worships Mary before Jesus." I don't have his actual words because he eventually deleted his post (as I'll explain in a minute).
Anyway, a number of folks engaged with him over his not-so-nice remarks about Catholics and the Catholic Church. I joined in by telling him that if he truly cared about representing Christ to a bunch of lost souls - you know, us Catholics - that he was going about it all wrong. I then challenged him that if he was truly a disciple of Christ, and was truly interested in witnessing about Christ to others, that I had 3 simple questions that I would like to ask him to help me discern as to whether or not he was truly a disciple of Christ. After all, the Bible tells us to "test the spirits." So I tested him. Those questions were:

1) For a Christian, what is the pillar and ground of truth...is it the Bible?

2) Is the Gospel of Mark inspired by God and, if so, by what authority do you claim it to be so...is it the Bible?

3) Are you infallible in your interpretation of the Bible?

These apparently piqued his interest and he began to engage with me by giving answers to the questions. At first, he didn't answer #1. But, I pushed him on it and eventually he did answer. And he got it wrong. He said that, "Yes," the Bible is the pillar and ground of the truth for the Christian. When I pointed out to him that the Bible says the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth, he didn't much like it and talked all around it - he had this big explanation about what the Greek word "ecclesia" means and that you need a degree in biblical studies to understand such things and so on.
He answered the 2nd question by saying that, "Yes," the Gospel of Mark is inspired Scripture, but he never could tell me how he knows that, other than to say that it's in the Bible, so it is inspired. He was either unable, or unwilling, to comprehend my questions as to how he knows it's inspired. I asked him flat out, "Since the Bible doesn't specifically state that the Gospel of Mark is inspired, and you go by the Bible alone for all that pertains to Christianity, then how do you know Mark is inspired Scripture? Who told you?" The whole time he kept answering as if he thought I was making the argument that Mark wasn't inspired. In other words, he never got the point of the question.
The third question he answered correctly - "No," he is not infallible in his interpretation of the Bible. When I then pointed out to him that that meant he could be misunderstanding and misinterpreting any or all passages of the Bible, since he relied on his own private interpretations for his doctrinal beliefs - he again either could not, or would not, understand what it was I was saying. No, he wasn't wrong in his interpretations as he knew the Greek words behind the English and he had a degree in biblical studies. And, besides, the Holy Spirit helps Christians interpret the Bible. Not realizing at all the problems inherent in the belief that the infallibleHoly Spirit guides him in his fallibleinterpretations of the Bible.
So, we went a few rounds, and each time he responded he called me more names and his tone just got meaner and nastier. Finally, he deleted his original post and with it went all of the comments - which is why I don't have his actual words for all of that. It never occurred to me that he would come back and delete everything, so I didn't copy any of it. He did message me, though, and said that this was the first time he had ever debated someone and that he felt as if he had done a poor job of it - both in tone and in substance. An apology of sorts.
His "apology" encouraged me, so I set out to see if I could get him to re-engage. That is where this newsletter starts. Having learned my lesson about how if the original post is deleted all subsequent posts are deleted, I copied all of the dialogue from there on. I will be going through that dialogue in the coming weeks. In his original answers to my 3 questions above, he had gone through a litany of things that the Catholic Church was wrong about - one of them being the sinlessness of Mary, about which he made a big deal. So, in an effort to re-engage him, I started there, with the intent to come back to authority and the original three questions. This newsletter picks up the dialogue there:

Challenge/Response/Strategy


Tony Thorne:


You will be accountable for your false teaching John.


John Martignoni:


And you will be accountable for yours, Tony. So, are you open to an honest and forthright discussion about Catholicism, your faith, and the Bible? You will be putting material out there for several thousand Catholics to see and your posts will not be edited.
What if I told you that I would offer you arguments, using the Bible, that Mary was without sin? If you are up to it, here is the first argument that I offer that Mary was sinless:

1) Nowhere does the Bible say that Mary committed a sin.


What is your response to that?

In Christ,
John


Strategy


First and foremost, I never let anyone remind me about my being held accountable for my "false teachings," without reminding them that they will be held accountable for theirs. The thing is, though, that my teachings are not my own, they are the Church's - the Church founded by Jesus Christ and guided by the Holy Spirit. Tony's teachings, however, are indeed his own. And remember, he has admitted that he is not infallible, which essentially means that he more than likely is putting at least some false teachings out there. I also am not infallible, which is why I do not rely on my own teachings, but on the teachings of the infallible Church founded by Jesus Christ.

I use this first "scriptural" argument to state that the Bible nowhere says, "Mary sinned." Nowhere. So, if you want to use the Bible to say that Mary did indeed sin, it would be, at best, an indirect argument from Scripture.

Tony Thorne:

Yes, it does. Romans 3:23

John Martignoni :

Excellent! That is exactly what I knew you would say. So then, it is your contention that when the Bible says, "since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God," (Rom 3:23), that means absolutely every person who has ever lived, no exception, has sinned. Which means Mary had to have sinned, correct?


Strategy


Romans 3:23 is, without exception, the very first verse, and usuallly the only verse, that folks point to when they attempt to scripturally "prove" that Mary was not immaculately conceived and that she did indeed commit sin during her life. That is why I made that first argument about Mary's sinlessness so general, because I knew he would respond by going straight to Rom 3:23. If you can overcome the argument from Rom 3:23, you have put a big chink in the anti-sinless argument. The first step in making my argument is to make sure that I get him on record as saying that his interpretation of Rom 3:23 means that " absolutelyevery person who has ever lived, no exception, has sinned." You'll see why this is important as we go through this.

Tony Thorne:

Yes sir, Jesus is the only exception.

John Martignoni:

Excellent reply! So, the word "all" means every person who has ever lived, no exception - except for Jesus. Now, in an earlier post [one of the posts that was deleted], I asked you if you were "seeking God." You said you were. Well, that is contrary to the Bible, at least, according to your interpretation of the Bible, because in Romans 3:11, it states the following: "No one seeks for God." If "all have sinned" means that everyone, without human exception, has sinned, then "No one seeks for God," means that no one, without human exception, seeks for God. Yet, you say that you do seek for God. Which means one of the following must be true: 1) You were wrong and you do not seek for God in your life; or 2) You think the Bible is wrong when it says "No one seeks for God." Which is it? Are you not seeking for God in your life, or do you believe the Bible is wrong when it says "No one" seeks for God?


Strategy


First of all, please note that while Tony made an exception in regard to Rom 3:23 not referring to Jesus, nowhere does the text of Rom 3:23 actually make that exception. And, again, nowhere does Rom 3:23 specifically mention Mary as having sinned. Tony added that to the Bible. Other than that one exception for Jesus, though, he agrees that Rom 3:23 means "absolutely" every person who has ever lived has sinned. Well, if "all" is taken as an absolute, then when the Bible says "no one" a few verses earlier, that must also be taken as an absolute in order to be consistent in our interpretation. In an earlier post I had asked Tony if he was "seeking God." How do you think every Christian on Earth is going to answer? "Yes, of course I'm seeking God." So, I filed that answer away in anticipation of this particular argument taking place.
So, my next step here was to point out to him that the Bible says "no one" is seeking for God, but that he said he was indeed seeking for God. So, by his methodology of interpretation, either the Bible is wrong or he is wrong. It has to be one or the other.

Tony Thorne:

I believe what that verse means in context as Paul was exerting in v10 that none are righteous, none understand. When you look up the greek word for seek, ( zetéo) you will find in its semantic range, the meaning, get to the bottom of. "But it was to us that God revealed these things by his Spirit." For his Spirit searches out everything and shows us God's deep secrets.(1 cor 2:10) then stretching across scripture (that never contradicts as we contexualize) we come to Jerimiah 29:13 "You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart". Then contextual staying with the theme of the Bible, we come to Mathew 7:7 "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. So, it seems my interpretation is in line at this point. In theology, we call it topicalizing when you exhort scripture noncontextually to prove a point, as you have attempted to do in your previous post? Back to 3:11 In context, this verse implies that man is unable to comprehend the truth of God or grasp his standard of rightuessness. sadly his spiritual ignorance does not result from a lack of opertunity, but is an expression of his depravity and rebellion.
As you have been shown, the Bible does tell us to seek God. Its very important to keep things in context John. Could you please now answer the question as to what makes you think mary never sinned? Please, direct answer would be valued.

John Martignoni:

I am going to let you guys chew on his response for a week. Your homework is to think about how you would respond to what he said. No need to send your thoughts to me, just think about it and maybe write down a few points you would make, and when I publish my response next week, you can compare and contrast it with your response. If you're like me, though, when you first read his response, your first thought was, "Huh?"

If this newsletter was forwarded to you by a friend, and you would like to be added to our distribution list, all you have to do is go to http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/newsletter and put your email address in the box at the top of the page. Either way, it will take you about 10 seconds.


 If this newsletter  was forwarded to you by a friend, and you would like to be added to our distribution list, all you have to do is go to  http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/newsletter and put your email address in the box at the top of the page.   Either way, it will take you about 10 seconds.

TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.












The fascists can't even leave baseball alone.

Just make the batters stay in the box and make the pitchers throw the ball. Simple.

Stop screwing with the best game EVER.

From Tom Gatto of The Sporting News:


MLB gets it wrong — again

I'm running out of clouds to yell at (and I'm not that old) when it comes to Major League Baseball. The commissioner and the players association keep changing rules, and the changes aren't for the better.

The announcement Tuesday that intentional walks will no longer require actual pitches being thrown is the latest miscue.

Beginning this season, hitters will be told to "Take your base" or something to that effect when they get near the batter's box. Just like that, they'll make their way to first base. It's all in the name of shaving seconds off the times of games, you know. And yes, we are talking seconds.

MORE: Manfred rips union for denying rules changes

Some quick math shows the folly of this decision.

Last season, major league teams issued 932 intentional walks. At four pitches per walk, that's 3,728 pitches. Granted, not every intentional walk included four intentional balls: Some were thrown after the count went to, say, 2-0, 3-0 or 3-1 as teams pitched around batters. But for the sake of this argument, let's say all the wide ones were intentional, with the catcher holding out his arm and all that.

FOSTER: Pace of play is just fine

That's 3,728 pitches spread out over the 2,428 regular-season games played in 2016. That is, on average ... 1.54 pitches per game.

MLB and the players, therefore, have agreed to jack around with game play to save the time needed to throw a pitch and a half per game. I don't care how long a nervous pitcher may need to throw that pitch and a half; it isn't nearly enough to merit such a radical change to the rules.

MORE: Manfred defends speed-up ideas

And it is a radical change. Not every intentional ball is perfectly executed (see the ending to Tuesday's Stephen F. Austin-Texas A&M game). The Yankees' Gary Sanchez reminded us last September that a hitter can swing at any pitch, wherever it's thrown. That's why teams try (well, tried) to keep intentional balls far away from hitters.

The change to the intentional walk rule adds to baseball's growing rules Hall of Shame. The slide rule. Increased use of replay. The shrinking strike zone. The potential ruination of extra innings.

MORE: Top spring training story lines

Fans and pundits rightly complain about the real drags on the pace of play, such as the TV commercial breaks between half-innings (MLB responded to that by putting a clock on the players, as if they were lollygagging), multiple mound conferences and pitchers who take forever to go to the plate with runners on base.

The conferences are being reviewed, but there's little chance of the other two things changing. Owners won't give up a penny in rights fees so networks can show fewer ads, and the union is against a pitch clock at the major league level.

At least we don't have to sit through pitchers throwing four wide ones anymore. Nothing ever went wrong with them anyway, right?

TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.

Monday, February 20, 2017

Ladies and gentleman, please welcome the perfect vagina.

Hello? Hello? Is anybody in there? Hello?

Ladies, don't take any crap from the guys over this one. Just ask them how that penis pump they ordered from the back pages of Penthouse worked.

Meet the Vagina Whisperer - Daily Mail




  • Gynecologist Dr Amir Marashi has performed over 400 vaginoplasties
  • Known as the 'vagina whisperer', the New York surgeon creates 'perfect' vaginas
  • Latest figures show over 5,000 women receive the surgery in the US each year
  • The rise is particularly in younger women as they see celebrities show off their 'designer vaginas'


  • How many of the alleged men in the Clump regime do you suppose ponied up the big bucks to make themselves look like a Kardasian between the legs?

    He is known around his office as the 'vagina whisperer'.

    That's because Dr Amir Marashi spends day in and day out creating 'perfect' vaginas.

    The New York-based doctor specializes in vaginoplasty - surgery 'down there' - and performs 80 to 100 procedures each year.

    And demand has grown so much the number of women undergoing the surgery has rocketed from 5,000 in 2013 to nearly 9,000 in 2015. 

    There are two reasons women come in for surgeries with Dr Marashi. The first is cosmetic purposes. Women feel uncomfortable about the size, the shape, or even color of their vagina. 

    Dr Marashi told Daily Mail Online: 'For each person, they want something different. But the most important thing is they feel better, they feel confident. 

    'Some report better orgasms, feeling more comfortable in the bedroom, and so on.' 

    The second is functionality purposes.

    'It'll be someone who has had one to two children and they feel their vagina is losing shape or consistency. Usually they're 35 or older,' he said.

    'Or they'll have a problem with their labia. They're uncomfortable wearing tight clothing, tight underwear. They're uncomfortable riding a horse or a bike.

    'They can be more prone to getting yeast infections.'

    At the end of the day, Dr Marashi says, the choice is up to the patient. But he makes sure he consults with them multiple times before they do decide to undergo surgery.

    The surgeon can shorten the labia, lighten the color, make the vagina moister, and amplify the G-spot.

    The surgeries, he says, can even help lift the bladder, helping with urination, and strengthen the rectum.

    Dr Marashi's ability to create the ideal vagina for his clients has earned him the nickname the 'vagina whisperer' among his staff.

    He said it first occurred while he was doing non-profit work in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake.

    There was a woman he was treating who was suffering from a vaginal fistula - when a hole develops between the vagina and either the bladder or the rectum - but had been too ashamed to talk about it.

    One of the nurses who was in the operating room with him commented: 'Wow, I can't believe you're some kind of vagina whisperer.'

    The name got passed around to his nurses back in New York and stuck.

    Over the course of his career, Dr Marashi has performed more than 400 surgeries and says he's seen a tremendous rise in the number of women wanting vaginoplasties.

    According to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, more than 5,000 women underwent the procedure in 2013.

    As of 2015, that figure was estimated to have risen to around 8,745 women. 

    Since Dr Marashi first began performing vaginal surgeries six years ago, he says particularly more younger women seem to want the surgery.

    One reason is that the subject is becoming less taboo as more and more celebrities show off their 'designer vaginas', including British model Katie Price and Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star Brandi Glanville.

    However, because of this celebrity rise, younger women see the procedure as a type of fashion statement.

    "Mine's Gucci. What about yours?

    'I always make sure they know that it's not something that they need but something that they want. I don't want to just do anything for cosmetic purposes,' Dr Marashi said.


    Sure, doc. Everybody knows a vajayjay with self-esteem issues.


    'If they decide they want to go through with it, that's fine, but they need to do their homework.' 

    For women who are considering undergoing the procedure, the surgeon offered some tips to follow:
    • Make sure your surgeon is board-certified
    • Make sure they've been performing the surgery for at least a few years
    • Go in for a face-to-face consultation
    • Ask for before and after pictures
    • Request written and/or in-person testimonials

    Face it, kiddies. This is only a symptom, not the disease...

    And yeah, we are doomed.


    TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.




    Jay Ambrose gets it about half right, which is pretty good for these benighted times.

    Mr. Ambrose commits two signature errors common to well-meaning but feckless folks. He tries to justify wrong things by pointing out that other people do wrong things too and he forgets that the lesser of two evils is also evil.

    Orange Clump is an enemy and must be thwarted at every turn just as Badcock Hussein Onana is an enemy and just as Distaff Clump is an enemy.

    Anyone who is indifferent to the evil done by my enemy is also my enemy.

    That last line could very well be Fyodor's Rule #11.

    Ambrose: How to build paranoia - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel


    An Atlantic magazine article by Washington journalist David Frum frets about a coming autocracy engineered by President Donald Trump, and the amazing thing is that the author did not notice the past eight years. It’s as if Noah’s Ark had finally landed and the understood message was that a flood was only now on its way.


    Equally bad as Trump is this kind of overwrought despair about him, the round-the-clock crying, the fanatical diatribes, the rioting, the celebrity angst, the intellectual wannabes worrying themselves into paranoia. Yes, Trump is as debased as debased gets for a president of the United States of America. He is ignorant, small-minded, vulgar, insensitive, inarticulate and egotistical, for starters.

    But all of this has to be viewed in context, and the context is Hillary Clinton, of course, the main encouragement for multitudes of Trump voters, and President Barack Obama, the opposite of Trump in sophistication though not in ego. He happened to be unequipped as president to negotiate with his assumed inferiors but prepared to discard democratic principles if they got in his legacy’s way.

    “We’re not just going to be waiting for legislation,” said Obama in 2014 after Republicans captured the Senate on top of controlling the House. “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone, and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward.”

    In other words, so much for constitutional checks and balances and on with unflinching power. It wasn’t just talk. It was action. Frum, to his credit, does mention Obama’s granting legal status to vast numbers of illegal immigrants after saying at least 22 times that he had no authority to do that without congressional approval. He was right. The order is now in court.

    Also in court is his order establishing a sweeping Clean Power Plan that would cost Americans a fortune in utility bills, erase scads of jobs and do zip about global warming (as admitted by EPA director Gina McCarthy). It was based on a plain misinterpretation of law and would simply scuttle state laws unconstitutionally (as argued by constitutional expert Laurence Tribe).

    There is much, much more along these lines, but consider one of the surest ways of autocratic oppression in these United States, and that’s tens of thousands of pages of regulations that aim to micromanage businesses and your life. Guess who holds records on all of this? Obama, of course. The most impressive of these, autocratically speaking, is his 600 major regulations costing a total of $743 billion. You can run but you can’t hide.

    Frum spends a lot of time on subjects irrelevant to his main topic, such as possible conflicts of interest. He gets downright ridiculous when he apparently thinks Trump’s rhetoric is more dangerous to a free press than the Obama administration’s spying on The Associated Press and threatening reporters with jail on issues of identifying sources. He goes after Fox TV as entangled in a Trump love affair without acknowledging a widespread media enmity that he himself illustrates.

    Frum also cheats statistics by denying a significant crime rise in America’s biggest cities in Obama’s last years in office, seeing this claim as a political trick by Trump to divide and conquer. Beyond Frum, there is the Muslim ban that was not a Muslim ban. There were the immigration raids that were no different from similar raids under Obama. There were Trump’s court criticisms that did not come close to Obama’s 2010 State of the Union assault on Supreme Court justices sitting right in front of him.

    “How To Build An Autocracy” is the headline of the Frum piece. Obama gave us some very good lessons.

    Jay Ambrose is a columnist for Tribune News Service. Email speaktojay@aol.com

    TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.

    Noted Washington outsider Rinse N. Repeatbus makes one yearn for the halcyon days of the fascist Nixon.

    "Nattering nabobs of negativity"...

    Are the Clumpskyites, paranoid, tone deaf, clueless, or simply fascist?

    Watch for Simply Fascist brand yogurt coming soon to your local supermarket.

    I smell a Napoleon Complex brewing, kiddies. You know, "I am the revolution! I am the nation!"


    Chris Wallace of Fox News [hardly a commie pinko] and Rinse N. Repeatbus, White [Racist.] House Chief of Stuff:

    WALLACE:  Here’s the problem, when the president says we’re the enemy of the American people, it makes it sounds like if you are going against him, you are going against the country.

    PRIEBUS:  Here is the problem, Chris — the problem is you’re right.  Some of these things were covered, but you get about 10 percent coverage on the fact that you get a very successful meeting with Bibi Netanyahu, the prime minister of the U.K., the prime minister of Canada —

    WALLACE:  We covered all of those news conference live. Everybody did.

    PRIEBUS:  Right.  Sure, yes, for about — yes, right.  But then as soon as it was over, the next 20 hours is all about Russian spies —

    WALLACE:  But you don’t get to tell us what to do, Reince.

    (CROSSTALK)

    PRIEBUS:  — nothing is happening.  Give me a break.

    WALLACE:  You don’t get to tell us what to do any more than Barack Obama did. Barack Obama whined about Fox News all the time, but I got to say, he never said that we were an enemy of the people.

    Ah, yes...if you attack the Fearful Leader who is, after all, the living embodiment of the sovereign [hee-hee] will of the sheeple, you must be an enemy of said sheeple. It's a classic.


    TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.

    Sunday, February 19, 2017

    The best weapon against fascism is...



     photo 15128642_zpsylcn5lbk.gif


    ...why, it's mockery, of course. Shecky Sanchez used to drive old Castro nuts. Until he was murdered by the secret police.


    TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.

    Saturday, February 18, 2017

    The previous post is a rant aginst the inevitable.

    TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.

    James Myers, Requiescat in pace.

     photo c8cc18a8c2db19faa80faf97c96b4132_crop_north_zpsidnh2f5j.png


    Dumbass Disney perverts. George was WWF all the way.


    George "the Animal" Steele


    www.georgetheanimalsteele.com/


    Welcome to the new George “the AnimalSteele Website ... there were two people using the same body – George “The AnimalSteele and Coach Jim Myers...



    Mr. Myers, AKA George “The Animal” Steele, is with us no more. I shall miss him. You can look him up if you like, but I know you probably won't. It doesn't really matter. Sadly, even tragically, this post isn't really about him.


    The Animal was a pro wrestler. You know, the kind of guy who made money by entertaining the white trash [Racist.] rubes who support fascism with their hard work and the taxes people like you [Well, the odds are good that this applies to some of you.] steal from them. His shtick was simple and quite inelegant. He played an almost subhuman character who was a literal terror in the ring, and who was, quite frankly, a bit of a retard.


    [Digression Number 1: “You insensitive monster! How dare you! You are the subhuman!”


    No, dearest pantywaist. I know Mr. Myers was just playacting. Of course, you think the word “actor” must be reserved for brave humanitarians like the dictator-slurping slug Sean Penn.


    "He's a real man”, you say. He would never make fun of anyone with a disability.”


    Perhaps not, but neither The Animal nor I have ever given aid or comfort to evil men who see all of God's children as their personal property.]


    Did you know Mr. Myers was an educator with a Master's degree? Nope, you did not.


    [Digression Number 2: Did you kiddies know Twitter will send you an Orwellian message “limiting” your use of their product if you dare to use the word “retarded” in a tweet? The arch-criminal in question tweeted about an upgrade to a video game as being “retarded”. Who knew algorithms could be fascist, too? Garbage in, garbage out, kiddies. If you let garbage settle in your minds, it will in all likelihood come out in the most disturbing and frightful ways. The same goes for the ever-fruitless quest to silence one's own conscience. Take our current Fearful Leader, for instance. Do you really think the Orange Messiah has a Master Plan he's executing each time he tweets? If you do, you just might be a dumbass.]


    The Animal rarely spoke. [Sweet gig, right?] One notable exception was the time when another character attached some device to his head and switched it on. The Animal slowly enunciated “How...now...brown...cow”. Priceless.


    Even [especially?] wrestling characters throw their fans the occasional curve ball. [See “Baseball - Born c. 1859 Died 1994”] It seems The Animal had developed a thing for Miss Elizabeth, a quite fetching character at the time. [May God have mercy on her poor, poor, soul.] They played it like a King Kong and Fay Wray thing.


    [Digression Number 3: I hope the upcoming Kong movie will be palatable, but I am not holding my breath. Hollyweird has not done the King justice since the original movie starring Miss Wray. For instance, what were they thinking when they cast the execrable Jessica Lang as the heroine?]


    Mr. Myers was a natural for that part. His back was hairier than any ape's.


    I would like to thank Mr. Myers for entertaining me and millions of other white trash [Racist.] losers. We just thought we were boys having fun. We now know that is incorrect and indeed, VERBOTEN! because EVERY TIME A MALE HAS FUN, A GIRL IS TORTURED, MUTILATED AND KILLED. SOMETIMES TWO GIRLS.


    That truly is a pity and I am thoroughly ashamed of my genitals, though not enough to use the ladies' restroom while in Charlotte.


    It is a pity because even though girls are icky to their very cores, I love them dearly and can't get enough of them. Of course, not in the way False Conservatives like Orange Clump and Rash Dimbulb [Conservative From the Waist Up] can't get enough. Even St. Ronnie Reagan was a serial adulterer. Just ask Jesus, if you dare. [I'm talking to you protestants. Seriously, can't you see you guys are making it up as you go along? “Over 33,000 different Christian (?) denominations can't possibly be right.” That arch-pervert Luther should have hired a better marketing firm.]


    As you kiddies may have noticed, I have been a bit angrier than usual lately. I know, hard to believe, right? I fear having my blood pressure read.


    I like to pretend that I am upset by the False Conservatives who talked a good game for decades and then betrayed their “beliefs”, their God, [Heck, who really knows what they worship? I fear it is the same thing the left-fascists do.] and their country because they found a big government liar, rhetorician and thief who put an “R” next to his name in order to fool the hoi polloi. [Look it up, kiddies.]


    Boy, did he fool them. Who would fall for such a scam? Why, the same people think who George “The Animal” Steele really was an animal AND the people who think they are our moral and intellectual superiors because they think pro wrestling [and anything else they happen to find unpleasant] promotes violence, rape, intolerance, obesity, and tooth decay.


    A pox on both their houses of worship, both left and right-fascists, for they worship at the altar of Power.


    I can't wait for someone to start a center-fascist movement. I can see it now...


    Uh, let's just murder 10% of the people we want to. Everybody else will surely obey us then.”


    Ain't life grand, kiddies?


    I just realized I am in the middle of Digression Number 4 and it's a doozy. [Look that word up, kiddies, and see what wonders your ancient ancestors created.]


    I'm not really upset with the False Conservatives. They're just ignorant douche bags like the rest of us, only more so.


    What really grinds my gears is how cheaply and easily we sold our souls and lost everything. I thought we would at least go down while putting up a fight like the kiddies in the original Red Dawn movie. [It is not permissible to speak of the horrific remake.] You know, shout “Wolverine!”, [Harbaugh's a weenie, BTW.] take out a couple of commies and go straight to Valhalla.


    Nope. Not even close.


    We sold out for easy access to porn, blowjobs, and blow. And, of course, the ability to buy our wives out of their guaranteed lifetime personal services contracts and get a newer, younger model without stretch marks that will believe our old lies like they are brand new.


    The odds are excellent that you yourself, dear reader, think that's quite a bargain and that “progress” has truly set you free. If not, you are one of the ever-shrinking remnant who shudders at the retribution that awaits both the innocent and the evildoers just around the corner.


    I am not speaking about the afterlife, kiddies. That's between each individual and Almighty God. He will absolutely separate the wheat from the chaff because He is the only One who truly knows the difference.


    I'm talking about the earthly price we will pay for screwing around and pissing away our freedoms while abandoning Truth and Justice and pretending the American Way ain't nothing but fast cars and getting laid.


    Oh, yeah. Rock 'N' Roll, too.


    I once hoped that when fascism triumphed in the land of the putatively free, we'd get lucky and wind up with a dictator like Francisco Franco. No such luck, kiddies.


    The truly frightening thing is there isn't even one real man among the fascists who oppress us. That would at least grant us the consolation of knowing we had been beaten by a stronger and more ruthless foe.


    Instead we are ruled by the likes of Badcock Insane Okhrana, [The Community Organizer From The High-Yellow Lagoon] and Orange Clump, who couldn't reason his way out of a wet paper bag, and the in-bred Bush family, who just know they know better than absolutely everybody, and Li'l Jimmy Malaise the intellectualoid anti-Semitic humanitarian, and Ike, who carved up perfectly good communities to build us a Nazi-style Autobahn of our very own, and Fellatio D. Rascalvelt, who was more in-bred than the Bushes, [and much, much, worse] and Woody “No-wood” Wilson, who thank God was too much of a pussy to live out all his hate-filled fantasies in the real world...


    Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera...ad infinitum...ad nauseum...


    God speed, Mr. Myers. There was never any shame in you hiding behind your public persona of George “The Animal” Steele. I hope and pray you never ever thought there was.



    TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.










    About Me

    My photo
    First of all, the word is SEX, not GENDER. If you are ever tempted to use the word GENDER, don't. The word is SEX! SEX! SEX! SEX! For example: "My sex is male." is correct. "My gender is male." means nothing. Look it up. What kind of sick neo-Puritan nonsense is this? Idiot left-fascists, get your blood-soaked paws off the English language. Hence I am choosing "male" under protest.

    Labels

    Blog Archive