So...What exactly do you mean by "democracy"?

From The Washington Times comes the sound of birth pangs:

Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari yesterday angrily rejected U.S. warnings to the Shi'ite majority to embrace sectarian rivals in a new government.

Hours later, a car bomb exploded on a street packed with shoppers in a Shi'ite area of Baghdad, killing 22 persons and wounding 28, police said.

Speaking after talks with British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who echoed the U.S. ambassador's call for a government of national unity, the normally calm and diplomatic Mr. al-Jaafari, a Shi'ite, said Iraq knew its own best interests.

"When someone asks us whether we want a sectarian government, the answer is 'no we do not want a sectarian government' -- not because the U.S. ambassador says so or issues a warning," he told reporters.

"We do not need anybody to remind us, thank you."

I still think they should divvy up the whole shebang into cantons, like the Swiss did. In several hundred years, you might have a civilized nation.

U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad warned Iraqis on Monday that they risk losing American support unless they establish a national unity government that takes the police and the army out of the hands of religious parties.

He reminded the Iraqis that the United States has spent billions to build up Iraq's police and army and said, "We are not going to invest the resources of the American people and build forces that are run by people who are sectarian" and tied to the militias.

Mr. Khalilzad's comments were echoed yesterday by Mr. Straw, who said after a meeting with Iraq's Kurdish president, Jalal Talabani, that Iraq's parliamentary election in December showed that no single group can monopolize power.

"No ethnic or religious grouping can dominate government," Mr. Straw said. "This, therefore, gives further impetus to what Iraqis tell us they want, which is a government of national unity bringing together all the different elements of Iraqi society."