The first review of Señor Spielbergo's* latest film is in!

WASHINGTON DIARIST

Hits
by Leon Wieseltier
Post date 12.09.05 Issue date 12.19.05


A few days before I read in Time that Steven Spielberg's new movie is so significant that there would be no advance screenings of it, (That means they're afraid of bad reviews. - F.G.) I went to an advance screening of it. The fakery is everywhere, isn't it, though in this instance it nicely captures the self-importance of this pseudo-controversial film. The makers of Munich seem to think that it is itself an intervention in the historical conflict that it portrays. For this reason, perhaps, they have devised a movie that wishes to be shocking and inoffensive at the same time. It tells the story of the Israeli retaliation for the massacre at the Munich Olympics in 1972--specifically, of the nasty adventures of a team of five Israelis that is dispatched to Europe to destroy eleven Palestinians. The film is powerful, in the hollow way that many of Spielberg's films are powerful. (OMG! YES! - F.G.) He is a master of vacant intensities, of slick searings. Whatever the theme, he must ravish the viewer. Munich is aesthetically no different from War of the Worlds, (Ouch! - F.G.) and never mind that one treats questions of ethical and historical consequence and the other is stupid. (Double ouch! - F.G.) Spielberg knows how to overwhelm. But I am tired of being overwhelmed. Why should I admire somebody for his ability to manipulate me? In other realms of life, this talent is known as demagoguery. There are better reasons to turn to art, better reasons to go to the movies, than to be blown away.... (Thanks to Drudge for the heads up.)

*Señor Spielbergo está aquí.