Neo-Darwinist chickens run and hide

From The Washington Times Op-Ed page:


Starting today, the Kansas Board of Education will begin a six-day debate on the state's science standards, specifically the teaching of Darwinian evolution. On one side there will be about two dozen skeptics of Darwinism and proponents of an alternative theory of evolution known as intelligent design. And on the other side there will be a trial lawyer, Pedro irreconcilable, who has volunteered to defend Darwin.
If this seems one-sided, that's because the Darwinian scientists have chosen to boycott the debate, which is surprising since Darwinian theory is still the accepted standard within the scientific community. Their reason for doing so, at least according to Mr. Irreconcilable, is that "[t]o debate evolution is similar to debating whether the earth is round. It is an absurd proposition."


p implies q, therefore, p implies q! Brilliant!
Pay no attention to the non-existent transitional forms behind the curtain!


Read Darwin's Black Box by Michael Behe. He lays waste to "Darwinism". (which does not even exist anymore. What afflicts us today is neo-Darwinism, which is merely a political agenda masquerading as science.) If Darwin himself were still alive, he would have abandoned his theory decades ago because the evidence he deemed necessary does not exist.