Featured Post

It seems Pope Francis needs to brush up on his Tertullian!

It has been reported (in The ChristLast Media, I must note) that the current Pope does not like the phrase "lead us not into temptation...

"Let no freedom be allowed to novelty, because it is not fitting that any addition should be made to antiquity. Let not the clear faith and belief of our forefathers be fouled by any muddy admixture." -- Pope Sixtus III

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Doy. Double doy, even.

From the Toronto Star:

Are humans getting dumber?

Forget moon landings and Monet, the invention of the Internet and the discovery of insulin. One Stanford University biologist thinks we’ve actually become less intelligent since the days our cave-dwelling ancestors roamed the Earth.

In a study recently published in the journal Trends in Genetics, Dr. Gerald Crabtree argues that human intelligence peaked at the time of hunter-gatherers and has since declined as a result of “genetic mutations” that have slowly eroded the human brain’s intellectual and emotional abilities.

The argument, which lends weight to the controversial hypothesis that human intelligence is determined by genetics as opposed to the environment, is based on the notion that a large pool of genes must be functioning at full capacity to optimize intellectual and emotional behaviour. 

According to Crabtree, “intelligence” genes were fully functioning in the days of hunter-gatherers, as humans were forced to think critically and creatively to survive. But the shift to agriculture and urbanization, he said, weakened natural selection and opened the door to genetic mutation. 

“I would wager that if an average citizen from Athens of 1000 BC were to appear suddenly among us, he or she would be among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues and companions,” he said. 

But fear not, said Crabtree, as the dumbing-down of humanity is a slow process, with only about “two or more” harmful mutations sustained in the past 3,000 years. He predicted a technological solution will be found to halt the mutations and “thus, the brutish process of natural selection will be unnecessary.”

It’s a polarizing stance in a field of research long divided by the “nature versus nurture” debate. While neither is scientifically proven, the idea that intelligence is rooted in genetic has had broad social and political implications, including the controversial eugenics movement. 

University of Toronto psychology professor Eyal Reingold, whose research leans toward the ‘nurture’ argument, described Crabtree’s research as “quite misleading” and said there are more serious threats to intellectual and emotional competency in the 21st century that are environment-based. 

Government schools sure ain't helpin'.

“When you see events such as children bringing guns to schools and bullying, they are all indications of failure of social competencies and decline in that domain,” he said.

No comments:

About Me

My photo
First of all, the word is SEX, not GENDER. If you are ever tempted to use the word GENDER, don't. The word is SEX! SEX! SEX! SEX! For example: "My sex is male." is correct. "My gender is male." means nothing. Look it up. What kind of sick neo-Puritan nonsense is this? Idiot left-fascists, get your blood-soaked paws off the English language. Hence I am choosing "male" under protest.


Blog Archive