Featured Post

It seems Pope Francis needs to brush up on his Tertullian!

It has been reported (in The ChristLast Media, I must note) that the current Pope does not like the phrase "lead us not into temptation...

"Let no freedom be allowed to novelty, because it is not fitting that any addition should be made to antiquity. Let not the clear faith and belief of our forefathers be fouled by any muddy admixture." -- Pope Sixtus III

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

I get mail from people claiming to be Michael Fumento...

Responding to my latest installment of In vitro, no one can hear you scream...,


fumento said:

I appreciate the posting, but "the scientific establishment" is not the enemy. Supporters of ESC research are ANTI-science. That some of them happen to be scientists themselves doesn't change this. The problem is they have a tremendous PR campaign and the media on their side. ASC scientists are too busy trying trying to help people and save lives to get out and grandstand.



I respectfully beg to differ. Certainly, honest and decent scientists dedicated to learning how Creation works do still exist, though I fear they are an ever-shrinking minority.

The "scientific establishment" is precisely the problem because real science is not its first priority. It may not be a priority at all anymore. From Freud to Timothy Leary, from Darwin to Margaret Mead, from Kinsey to Rachel Carson, real science has been hijacked in the name of socialist fascism. (My apologies for including Citizen Darwin in this Rogues' Gallery. He was a real scientist who, I believe, would be horrified and outraged by what has been done in his name. We are currently suffering from what should be termed "neo-darwinism".)

Of course, these evil clowns could not have wreaked so much havoc on their own. Government, media, and the criminal decline of American education have certainly helped. But the scientific community must shoulder the greatest share of the blame because it has not done enough to combat the rot within its own ranks.


(While I would be flattered if Mr. Fumento noticed my little idiot corner of Bloggerdom, I doubt he would bother to comment. As with everything in cyberspace, kiddies, take it with at least a grain of salt, if not more.)

1 comment:

TheChurchMilitant said...

I apologize for the skepticism, but that is the price one pays here in Bloggerdom. If you could read the kind of e-mail I get, you'd wonder why a real author with a real reputation would notice my idiot blog. At least you don't send me five thousand word screed proving the Catholic Church is the antichrist,and for that I thank you. The intelligent conversation you provide me is pure gravy.

For what it is worth, I thought "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS" was an excellent book.

But...

Is there really no such thing as a scientific community? Are there no shared goals, no common interests, no similar likes and dislikes among people of similar social and educational backgrounds? Do not scientists congregate together and join scientific organizations? You are straining the bounds of credulity.

I am not, after all, claiming scientists are a monolithic leftist mob like the news media, where 90% vote one way and one way only. Such a thing isn't necessary to nudge laymen's beliefs in the desired direction.

All one needs is a few dedicated ideologues willing to bully the community into line. If Lenin and a handful of Bolsheviks can succeed beyond anyone's expectations, is it really surprising the American Psychological Association can declare homosexuality suddenly nonexistent with nary a peep of protest to be heard?

Again, the question is not the relative numbers of real scientists and those who use science merely to advance their political agendas. The question is will those with the most to lose from the corruption of science do enough restore its reputation?

Regardless of whether I have any clue or not, don't you think science and scientists would be better off if they did behave as if they were part of a community, looking out for one another, policing the bad guys, and keeping the place tidy, helpful, and friendly to any non-scientists who may happen by?

About Me

My photo
First of all, the word is SEX, not GENDER. If you are ever tempted to use the word GENDER, don't. The word is SEX! SEX! SEX! SEX! For example: "My sex is male." is correct. "My gender is male." means nothing. Look it up. What kind of sick neo-Puritan nonsense is this? Idiot left-fascists, get your blood-soaked paws off the English language. Hence I am choosing "male" under protest.

Labels

Blog Archive