TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.
Showing posts with label Clump Rising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clump Rising. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
In honor of CUBEUPLOAD.COM, my new photo hosting site, I proudly present the Leecher of the Free World in all its gory.
Friday, February 03, 2017
Fyodor begins the laborious 8 year long [unless God cuts us a break] task of naming the latest psychopath to afflict us.
Not that psychology hasn't been kidnapped, raped, and killed by the left-fascists, but some of its terms can come in handy. I present to you...
1) America's Newest Arrested Development President!
I'm not sure exactly what that means, but it is obvious Orange Clump never got past the stage where little boys discover their own genitalia.
Of course, there are those monikers that have become instant classics...
2) The Clod Prince of Orange
...which also takes a whack at the alleged Christians that lick its feet and other appendages.
And that leads us to...
3) The Orange Messiah
If you think the left-fascists were slavish in their devotion to Badcock Insane Okhrana, take a gander at the "evangelical Christian conservatives" who, like ALL heretics, can't tell the gospel from their rectums. [I have been trying to keep my New Year's resolution to be more clinical and less scatological in the midst of my disgust.] It will come as no surprise to all you good little kiddies that they are all, when it come to freedom versus license, Conservatives From the Waist Up.
4) Clumpy The Clown
Self-explanatory.
5) The Orange Menace
Ditto. [Which reminds me...Fornicate you, Rash Dimbulb, you fat, deaf, drug addicted serial adulterer and traitor.]
Here's one you won't read anywhere else, kiddies:
6) America's First Luddite [Look it up.] President.
That's right. For the first time ever we have as Fearful Leader a thingee who actually believes that technological progress must be reversed in order to provide jobs for us plebes. [Of course, it couches this ignorance in terms of fear and loathing of Mexicans and Chinamen, which makes it more appealing to AWUGs.* Why? Because AWUGs love their gadgets. Who doesn't like machines? They're clean and cool. Mexicans and Chinamen are smelly and scary.]
*Angry White Unemployed Guys. And they are more than likely to stay that way.
TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.
Monday, January 30, 2017
ATTACK FROM THE REAL RIGHT: Fyodor whacks the Orange Messiah and his dumbass prod enablers!
During this past election campaign, my sensitive ears were assaulted by my ignorant heretic neighbors proclaiming the arch-pervert Clump as the Chosen One of God. Their bona fides as Christians are today in shambles as they proclaim the glory of their true messiah, Clumpy the Clown.
You kiddies know nobody hates the goat raping mindset of the non-moderate mohammedans more than Your Humble Narrator, but did you notice that Orange Clump's immigration order makes no distinction between murderous terrorists and the poor real Christians of the Holy Land who are the very ones being murdered and terrorized?
Nary a bleat from the fake Christian sheeple is heard. There is a particularly nasty place waiting in Hell for the lot of you. May the One, True God have mercy on your black bloody souls, you idolaters, you worshippers of men and their alleged power!
TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017
Hey, you orange asshat, how about American babies first?
You know, Donna, some of us real American men can still [unlike you] get it up. How about putting our kiddies first?
Oh, yeah, I forgot...you were for eating babies before you were against it.
The Netherlands Is Creating An International Fund To Counter ...
Legendary? Please.
Shut up and choke on your tulips you pansies.
Donald Trump's abortion funding ban will lead to ... - The Independent
Donald Trump's decision to block US funding for abortion services around the world could result in tens of thousands of women dying, with the ...
Doubtful, but at least none of them will be little kids.
Mexico City Policy: What is the abortion funding ban that Donald ...
Donald Trump is reinstating a ban on providing federal money to international groups that perform abortions or provide information on the ...
I wonder how many babies the Orange Menace has put out hits on...all the whores he calls "wife" [and all those prostitutes, too]...it could be hundreds...even more than Marilyn Monroe.
TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.
I wonder how many babies the Orange Menace has put out hits on...all the whores he calls "wife" [and all those prostitutes, too]...it could be hundreds...even more than Marilyn Monroe.
TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.
Monday, January 16, 2017
Fyodor pledges to boycott every company that knuckles under to the orange fascist bullyboy.
Face it, kiddies. The orange menace is merely buying votes with your tax money. [Sound familiar?]
I'd type "Fuck him", but I have a sneaking suspicion he's into that.
TheChurchMilitant: Sometimes anti-social, but always anti-fascist since 2005.
Monday, December 19, 2016
Did you wonder why the Clod Prince of Orange chose to whack Boeing?
Here's the skinny, kiddies:
Boeing has a $170 million contract to design the new Air Force One, not REPEAT NOT $4 billion as the orange dictatrix tweeted. Why the lie? (I know, I know. "Because it is still breathing.")
Earlier, Boeing's CEO had publicly questioned the wisdom of Clump's 18th century throwback mercantilist economic fascism and its future effects on the economy.
Beware, kiddies.
Friday, December 16, 2016
Your Humble Narrator courts future trouble with the IRS, the Secret Service, NAMBLA, its Russian equivalent, and the chekists (who are, frankly, the Russian equivalent) OR,
ESTABLISHMENT UBER ALLES! OR, YOU CAN'T
DRAIN A SWAMP BY PUTTING THE SWAMP MONSTERS* IN CHARGE.
*Thanks to Mark Levin (My third
favorite Jew...Go ahead and try to guess. Here's a hint: Bob Dylan is
Number 4.) for that one.
I know you Clumpskyites and AWUGs
(Angry White Unemployed Guys) out there don't want to read the truth,
but you've got yourselves tangled up in a genuine cult of personality
with this orange psychopath and you are either too proud or too
ignorant to admit it.
I know you voted for it because you
thought it would wreak vengeance on those who have wronged you. That
is just stupid on so many levels. The thirst for revenge blinds you
and makes you weak and vulnerable. A cold and calculating victory
strategy that would put your enemies to flight is what is called for.
But no, you'd rather rage and scream at the darkness because it makes
you feel better now. Meanwhile, the creature you consider your hero
is giving your enemies power to rule over you while you applaud it
for its wondrous "honesty" and "outsider"
thinking.
SUCKERS.
For example, the guy who is about to
become your Treasury Secretary is a George Soros bootlicker. And you
claim to be an anti-commie anti-globalist American patriot! You are
a sucker and a dumbass.
How about your new Secretary of State?
He's been sucking Czarina Putina's strap-on for years and getting
rich in return. He' s also a baby-eater, a "climate change"
freedom and job destroying fascist and the very definition of
globalist elite insider. But I'm sure he loves his dog...as long as
it doesn't produce too much methane. Can't wait for those robot
dogs...
You suckers.
All you'll need to do is watch the
Democrass senators at the confirmation hearings. They will only
attack the REAL CONSERVATIVES, the true anti-power,
anti-establishment outsiders. Beware of those to whom they give a
pass.
And one more thing before I forget.
What sane human thinks that creepy little sodomite opressing poor
Russia deserves anything more than a .22 to the back of his fat head?
(As an amateur Russian historian, I think a bomb thrown at his
motorcade is more likely. However, my Russian cousins have proved
themselves more than adept at both.)
And I do mean sodomite. All that
photo-op judo and hunting and deep sea diving is certainly over-compensating for something. (I wouldn't be surprised if Germaine Greer in drag knows exactly what.) And WTF is up with all that
barechested bareback riding? That sort of thing attracts a specific
sub-genre. You can look it up.
Of course, Clump may simply be a Putina sycophant. I'm not saying that Clump itself definitely is a
homosexual, but you must admit there appears to be quite a lot of
over-compensation going on there, too. (It is a world famous
jock-sniffer. Maybe it's just a big sports fan. Maybe it likes to pay
powerfully built young men to urinate on it while it reclines naked
in its solid gold bathtub. Who knows?)
Has anybody really given any thought to
that whole "grab her by the pussy" thing? It doesn't make
any sense. It can buy all the pussy it wants and then some. Plus,
there are oodles of females all over the world willing to debase
themselves just for a contact high from all that money and power. So
why the badass predator act? Could it be that l'il Clumpy can't rise
to the occasion?
Even if it does like girls, it seems
reasonable to assume it needs some kind of violence and/or
degradation to get off.
We'll probably never know for sure,
because money definitely can buy you happiness, kiddies...or at least the silence
of your victims.
Hey, wouldn't it be funny if Laura
Ingraham entered her daughter in a Clump beauty contest? Not funny
for the child, of course. But then again, who cares about children?
Certainly not her mommy, the alleged Catholic, who now votes the
straight (and perhaps not so straight) BabyEater ticket.
Monday, December 12, 2016
LOOK, KIDDIES! It's Clumpy, the orange threat to love, decency, freedom, and everybody's brain cells!
See Clumpy's tiny hands, kiddies? That means his penis is smaller than that of all the other clowns. Even Harry Reid's.
And it is much, much smaller than Hitlery's strap-on dildo. (Goober II has been getting hit pretty hard in his pooper ever since the election.)
Wage and price controls and tariffs, anyone?
Clumpy the Clown is a cross between Herbert Hoover and Richard Nixon without the brains of the former or the boyish charm of the latter.
Thursday, December 08, 2016
Sorry, George. You are too little and too late. (Not to mention not conservative enough to be a credible Clump critic.)
From Washington's other newspaper comes the plaintive cry of the not-so-conservative-that-he- doesn't-get-invited-to-all-those-swell-DC-parties Mr. Will. The funny thing is, he's absolutely correct on this one.
Trump’s Carrier deal is the opposite of conservatism
Republicans succumb to the fatal conceit that politicians know better than markets.
So, this is the new conservatism’s recipe for restored greatness: Political coercion shall supplant economic calculation in shaping decisions by companies in what is called, with diminishing accuracy, the private sector. This will be done partly as conservatism’s challenge to liberalism’s supremacy in the victimhood sweepstakes, telling aggrieved groups that they are helpless victims of vast, impersonal forces, against which they can be protected only by government interventions.
Responding to political threats larded with the money of other people, Carrier has somewhat modified its planned transfers of some manufacturing to Mexico. This represents the dawn of bipartisanship: The Republican Party now shares one of progressivism’s defining aspirations — government industrial policy, with the political class picking winners and losers within, and between, economic sectors. This always involves the essence of socialism — capital allocation, whereby government overrides market signals about the efficient allocation of scarce resources. Therefore it inevitably subtracts from economic vitality and job creation.
Although the president-elect has yet to dip a toe into the swamp, he practices the calculus by which Washington reasons, the political asymmetry between dispersed costs and concentrated benefits. The damages from government interventions are cumulatively large but, individually, are largely invisible. The beneficiaries are few but identifiable, and their gratitude is telegenic.
When, speaking at the Carrier plant, Vice President-elect Mike Pence said, “The free market has been sorting it out and America’s been losing,” Donald Trump chimed in, “Every time, every time.” When Republican leaders denounce the free market as consistently harmful to Americans, they are repudiating almost everything conservatism has affirmed: Edmund Burke taught that respect for a free society’s spontaneous order would immunize politics from ruinous overreaching — from the hubris of believing that we have the information and power to order society by political willfulness. In an analogous argument, Friedrich Hayek warned against the “fatal conceit” of believing that wielders of political power can supplant the market’s “efficient mechanism for digesting dispersed information.” The Republican Party is saying goodbye to all that.
Indiana’s involvement in the Carrier drama exemplifies “entrepreneurial federalism” — states competing to lure businesses. This is neither new nor necessarily reprehensible. There are, however, distinctions to be drawn between creating a favorable climate for business generally and giving direct subsidies to alter the behavior of businesses already operating in the state. And when ad-hoc corporate welfare, including tariffs, becomes national policy, it becomes a new arena of regulation, and hence of rent-seeking, which inevitably corrupts politics. And by sapping economic dynamism, it injures the working class.
The most widely discussed and properly praised book germane to today’s politics is J.D. Vance’s “Hillbilly Elegy,” about the sufferings and pathologies of the white working class, largely of Scots-Irish descent, in Appalachia and the Rust Belt. This cohort, from which Vance comes, is, he says, one of America’s most distinctive subcultures, particularly in its tenacious clinging to traditional mores, many of them destructive.
His book has often been misread as primarily about the toll taken by economic forces — globalization, automation, etc. Actually, Vance casts a cool eye on the theory that “if they only had better access to jobs, other parts of their lives would improve as well.” His primary concern is with “lack of agency” and “learned helplessness” — the passive acceptance of victim status.
One theory of the 2016 election is that the white working class rebelled not just against economic disappointments but also against condescension, demanding not just material amelioration but, even more, recognition of its dignity. It is, however, difficult for people to believe in their own dignity when they believe that their choices are powerless to alter their lives’ trajectories. Eventually, they will detect the condescension in the government’s message that their fortunes are determined not by things done by them but by things done to them.
Such people are susceptible to charismatic presidential leadership, with its promise that executive power without limits can deliver them from unhappiness by delivering to them public goods. In contrast, there was dignity in the Joad family (of John Steinbeck’s “The Grapes of Wrath”). When the Dust Bowl smothered Oklahoma, the Joads were not enervated, they moved west in search of work.
What formerly was called conservatism resisted the permeation of society by politics, and particularly by the sort of unconstrained executive power that has been wielded by the 44th president. The man who will be the 45th forthrightly and comprehensively repudiates the traditional conservative agenda and, in reversing it, embraces his predecessor’s executive swagger.
Read more here:
Lawrence H. Summers: Trump’s Carrier deal could permanently damage American capitalism
George F. Will: Donald Trump’s rise reflects American conservatism’s decay
Bernie Sanders: Carrier just showed corporations how to beat Donald Trump
Thursday, December 01, 2016
Wednesday, November 23, 2016
A NEW AMERICAN RECORD! or, NO MATTER WHO YOU VOTE FOR, THE GOVERNMENT GETS IN!
125 million dumbasses! 125 million suckers! 125 million I TOLD YOU SOS! (Yeah, that is an S.O.S as well.) If you voted for either Clump, THIS MEANS YOU!
Prepare to reap the whirlwind, kiddies
The orange clown has begun its reign of terror (a bit earlier than even Your Humble Narrator imagined) just as the Bolsheviks did - by turning on its political allies first (They are naturally the softest targets, after all. Who could imagine Comrade Lenin - oops I mean Clump of course - would not wipe outour common enemies as soon as we handed him power?
Certainly not Sean O'Spammity! Certainly not Rash Dimbulb! Certainly not The Savage Weiner! And most definitely not the oh-so-conveniently "Catholic" Sauron Ingraham!
Or maybe they did...
Guess what happens when you betray your principles, your country, and you God, kiddies.
YOU LOSE EVERYTHING!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
Orange Clump isn't going after Hitlery. It literally holds every position on every issue. If that isn't madness, the word has lost all meaning.
Read its own words spoken to The Old Gray Whore unless you value your own sanity and your soul:
Donald Trump's New York Times Interview: Full Transcript
Media|Less Defiant Trump at The Times: 'I Hope We Can All Get Along'
Trump, in Interview, Moderates Views but Defies Conventions
Donald Trump's New York Times Interview in 12 Tweets
And here's one from Washington's other newspaper...
Trump's new interview with the New York Times isn't reassuring
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!
Monday, November 21, 2016
Mittens The Pompadoured Pussy is so far inside he's become an INSIDE-OUTER!
Now he's got his marvelous head of hair inside Clump's orange colon! (That's right, kiddies, I didn't vote for him, either.)
Do any of you Clumpskyites need more evidence you've been had? You suckers are gonna get it soon...and you're gonna get it hard. Time to bend over and grab your ankles...
More news...
P.S. I told you the orange clown was no outsider. Suckers!
Thursday, November 17, 2016
Why haven't Steve Bannon and Germaine Greer ever been seen together?????????
Germaine Greer [above].
Germaine Greer in drag.
Because the clod prince of the ACK! right and the real women-hating commie cow ARE ONE AND THE SAME!
Remember, kiddies, if it fucks like a fascist, steals like a fascist, and murders like a fascist, it is a fascist.
Monday, November 14, 2016
Oooooooooo...look at all the outsiders!
From I Hate Fox News:
Reince Priebus is Trump’s Appointed Chief of Staff
Reported by The New York Times WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald J. Trump on Sunday chose Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee and a loyal campaign adviser, to be his White House chief of staff, turning to a Washington insider whose...
Donald Trump Is Picking His Cabinet. Here’s a Shortlist.
Donald Trump Is Picking His Cabinet. Here’s a Shortlist.
A list of possibilities for key posts in the new administration.
White House Chief of Staff
The chief of staff manages the work and personnel of the West Wing, steering the president's agenda and tending to important relationships. The role will take on outsize importance in a White House run by Mr. Trump, who has no experience in policy making and little in the way of connections to key players in Washington.
Reince Priebus Mr. Trump announced Sunday that he had chosen Mr. Priebus, the Chairman of the Republican National Committee.
Stephen K. Bannon The right-wing media executive and chairman of Mr. Trump’s campaign was also considered, but Mr. Trump instead named him chief strategist and senior counselor in the White House. Some have denounced the move, warning that Mr. Bannon represents nationalist and racist views.
John R. Bolton Former United States ambassador to the United Nations under George W. Bush
Bob Corker Senator from Tennessee and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Newt Gingrich Former House speaker
Zalmay Khalilzad Former United States ambassador to Afghanistan
Stanley A. McChrystal Former senior military commander in Afghanistan
Thomas Barrack Jr. Founder, chairman and executive chairman of Colony Capital; private equity and real estate investor
Jeb Hensarling Representative from Texas and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee
Steven Mnuchin Former Goldman Sachs executive and Mr. Trump’s campaign finance chairman
Tim Pawlenty Former Minnesota governor
Kelly Ayotte Departing senator from New Hampshire and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee
Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn Former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (he would need a waiver from Congress because of a seven-year rule for retired officers)
Stephen J. Hadley National security adviser under George W. Bush
Jon Kyl Former senator from Arizona
Jeff Sessions Senator from Alabama who is a prominent immigration opponent
Chris Christie New Jersey governor
Rudolph W. Giuliani Former New York mayor
Jeff Sessions Senator from Alabama
Jan Brewer Former Arizona governor
Robert E. Grady Gryphon Investors partner
Harold G. Hamm Chief executive of Continental Resources, an oil and gas company
Forrest Lucas President of Lucas Oil Products, which manufactures automotive lubricants, additives and greases
Sarah Palin Former Alaska governor
Sam Brownback Kansas governor
Chuck Conner Chief executive officer of the National Council of Farmer Cooperatives
Sid Miller Texas agricultural commissioner
Sonny Perdue Former Georgia governor
Chris Christie New Jersey governor
Dan DiMicco Former chief executive of Nucor Corporation, a steel production company
Lewis M. Eisenberg Private equity chief for Granite Capital International Group
Victoria A. Lipnic Equal Employment Opportunity commissioner and work force policy counsel to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce
Dr. Ben Carson Former neurosurgeon and 2016 presidential candidate
Mike Huckabee Former Arkansas governor and 2016 presidential candidate
Bobby Jindal Former Louisiana governor who served as secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Rick Scott Florida governor and former chief executive of a large hospital chain
James L. Connaughton Chief executive of Nautilus Data Technologies and former environmental adviser to President George W. Bush
Robert E. Grady Gryphon Investors partner
Harold G. Hamm Chief executive of Continental Resources, an oil and gas company
Dr. Ben Carson Former neurosurgeon and 2016 presidential candidate
Williamson M. Evers Education expert at the Hoover Institution, a think tank
Jeff Miller Retired chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee
Joe Arpaio Departing sheriff of Maricopa County, Ariz.
David A. Clarke Jr. Milwaukee County sheriff
Michael McCaul Representative from Texas and chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee
Jeff Sessions Senator from Alabama
Myron Ebell A director at the Competitive Enterprise Institute and a prominent climate change skeptic
Robert E. Grady Gryphon Investors partner who was involved in drafting the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Jeffrey R. Holmstead Lawyer with Bracewell L.L.P. and former deputy E.P.A. administrator in the George W. Bush administration
Dan DiMicco Former chief executive of Nucor Corporation, a steel production company, and a critic of Chinese trade practices
Kelly Ayotte Departing senator from New Hampshire and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee
Richard Grenell Former spokesman for the United States ambassador to the United Nations during the George W. Bush administration
Michael T. Flynn Former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency
Peter Hoekstra Former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee
Mike Rogers Former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee
Frances Townsend Former homeland security adviser under George W. Bush
Michael T. Flynn Former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency
Wednesday, November 09, 2016
AMERICA CHOOSES 4 MORE YEARS OF FASCISM!
Yes, kiddies, the inevitable has happened, but this time it is right-fascism. Corporatism and big government will continue to run roughshod over us little people, contrary to the masturbatory fantasies of the False Conservatives [Rash Dimbulb, Sean Spamity, Laura "No, seriously, I really am Catholic" Ingraham, The Savage Weiner, et al.]
We real conservatives will be the first targets of Clump The Orange. [Doubt me? Just look to Uncle Joe Stalin for the answer. The first people he liquidated were his "allies" on the left, like the Mensheviks. Ever seen a live Menshevik, kiddies? Nope, me neither.] But rest assured IT will get around to everyone who dares to say mean and nasty things about IT. For instance, just wait until white working men don't magically get jobs and the price of EVERYTHING they buy goes sky high due to the tariffs IT promised will punish those evil foreigners and cure cancer at the same time. They'll turn on the Orange Clown in a heartbeat and he will return the favor with bloodthirsty vengeance.
And don't get me started on the Orangenald and Big Babykilling. If Planned Black Genocide was on the NYSE, it would be time to take the kids' college fund and BUY!
As always, I urge you to buy lots of guns and lots of ammo and teach every man, woman , and child you love how to use them. You're going to need all the help you can get.
Friday, October 21, 2016
Fyodor goes all Nostradamus on you.
Wanna see the headlines for November 9, 2016? Read 'em and weep, kiddies.
AMERICA CHOOSES 4 MORE YEARS OF FASCISM!!!
Seriously, kiddies. Weep for the country we once had and for future generations...if they are allowed to be born, that is.
It doesn't matter which of the two sociopaths wins. It is time to stock up on guns and ammunition. At least you might have the satisfaction of sending a couple of their minions to Hell before they gun you down.
Monday, October 10, 2016
How Catholics should vote, but often don't.
John Martignoni knows what he's talking about, kiddies.
If you would like to be added to our distribution list, all you have to do is go to http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/newsletter and put your email address in the box at the top of the page.
Hey folks,
A lot of people send me apologetics questions via email or through Facebook. Unfortunately, because of the number of questions I receive, I am unable to answer all but a small number of them. We're approaching 35,000 subscribers to this newsletter, from all 50 states and some 75 or so countries. If even a small percentage of those subscribers send me questions during any given month, we're talking hundreds of questions. Some of those questions might take a minute or two to write, but an hour or two (or more) to answer. I could literally spend all day every day answering email and FB questions, but if I did that I wouldn't be able to pay the bills.
I would love to be able to answer all of those questions, but it simply is not possible. So, if you sent me a question and have not received an answer, my apologies. But, that's why I started this newsletter in the first place, to try and answer the more common questions that I receive - questions that Catholics receive about topics related to their faith.
Introduction
Having said that, I have been getting a lot of emails in the last few weeks - and messages on Facebook - about the elections. So, with the elections looming, I thought I would re-visit the Catholic Voting Principles that I published in one of these newsletters right about 4 years ago.Challenge/Response/Strategy
Voting Principles for Catholics1) “There are some things we must never do, as individuals or as a society, because they are always incompatible with love of God and neighbor. Such actions are so deeply flawed that they are always opposed to the authentic good of persons. These are called ‘intrinsically evil' actions. They must always be rejected and opposed and must never be supported or condoned,” (Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, USCCB, #22).
Principle: You cannot support something that is intrinsically evil.
2) “A vote for a candidate who promotes actions or behaviors that are intrinsically evil and gravely sinful makes you morally complicit and places the eternal salvation of your own soul in serious jeopardy,” (Catholic Times, September 23, 2012, Bishop Thomas Paprocki, Diocese of Springfield).
"It is important to be clear that the political choices faced by citizens not only have an impact on general peace and prosperity but also may affect the individual's salvation,” (Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, USCCB, #38).
Principle: By voting for someone who supports and advocates an intrinsic evil, you are participating in that intrinsic evil, and could possibly be committing a mortal sin that jeopardizes your eternal salvation.
3) “Some issues involve ‘intrinsic evils’; that is, they can never under any circumstance or condition be morally justified. Preeminent among these intrinsic evils are legalized abortion, the promotion of same sex unions and ‘marriages’, repression of religious liberty, as well as public policies permitting euthanasia, racial discrimination or destructive human embryonic stem cell research,” (Clarification of Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, Bishops of Dallas/Ft. Worth ).
Principle: Abortion, same-sex “marriage,” and the repression of religious liberty - which are three of the pre-eminent issues in this current election cycle - are indeed all intrinsically evil. Therefore, by voting for someone who advocates and supports abortion, same-sex “marriage,” and/or the repression of religious liberty, you are participating in an intrinsic evil and could be jeopardizing your salvation.
4) "The fact that only the negative commandments oblige always and under all circumstances does not mean, that in the moral life, prohibitions are more important than the obligation to do good indicated by the positive commandment," (Veritatis Splendor, Pope John Paul II, #52).
“The right to life implies and is linked to other human rights—to the basic goods that every human person needs to live and thrive. All the life issues are connected, for erosion of respect for the life of any individual or group in society necessarily diminishes respect for all life. The moral imperative to respond to the needs of our neighbors—basic needs such as food, shelter, health care, education, and meaningful work—is universally binding on our consciences and may be legitimately fulfilled by a variety of means,” (Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, USCCB, #25).
Principle: Both opposing evil and doing good - feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, caring for the sick, etc. - are essential obligations. Issues that pertain to basic needs such as food, shelter, health care, education, and meaningful work are all linked to the right to life.
5) "Disregard for the right to life, precisely because it leads to the killing of the person whom society exists to serve, is what most directly conflicts with the possibility of achieving the common good...It is impossible to further the common good without acknowledging and defending the right to life, upon which all the other inalienable rights of individuals are founded and from which they develop..." (The Gospel of Life, Pope John Paul II, #72; #101)
"The direct and intentional destruction of innocent human life from the moment of conception until natural death is always wrong and is not just one issue among many. It must always be opposed," (Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, USCCB, #28).
“Therefore, we cannot make more clear the seriousness of the overriding issue of abortion – while not the ‘only issue’ – it is the defining moral issue, not only today, but of the last 35 years. Since the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, more than 48 million innocent lives have been lost. Each year in our nation more than one million lives are lost through legalized abortion,” (Clarification of Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, Bishops of Dallas/Ft. Worth ).
Principle: Abortion is the overriding issue, the defining moral issue, of our day because it is from the right to life that all the other rights - the right to food, shelter, health care, religious liberty, etc. - flow and are made meaningful.
6) “As Catholics we are faced with a number of issues that are of concern and should be addressed, such as immigration reform, healthcare, the economy and its solvency, care and concern for the poor, and the war on terror. As Catholics we must be concerned about these issues and work to see that just solutions are brought about. There are many possible solutions to these issues and there can be reasonable debate among Catholics on how to best approach and solve them. These are matters of 'prudential judgment.' But let us be clear: issues of prudential judgment are not morally equivalent to issues involving intrinsic evils. No matter how right a given candidate is on any of these issues, it does not outweigh a candidate's unacceptable position in favor of an intrinsic evil such as abortion or the protection of ‘abortion rights,’” (Clarification of Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, Bishops of Dallas/Ft. Worth ).
“Jesus tells us very clearly that if we don’t help the poor, we’re going to go to Hell...But, Jesus didn’t say the government has to take care of them, or that we have to pay taxes to take care of them. Those are prudential judgments...You can’t say that somebody is not Christian because they want to limit taxation. To say that it’s somehow intrinsically evil like abortion doesn’t make any sense at all,” (National Catholic Reporter, Interview with Archbishop Chaput, September 14, 2012).
Principle: Not to have concern for, and not to care for, the poor, and the provision of basic human needs - food, shelter, healthcare, and so on - is intrinsically evil. However, the best way to address issues pertaining to the care and concern for the poor, and the provision of basic human needs, is a matter that can and should be discussed and debated. Disagreements as to the best way to address the concerns of the poor - more/less government; more/less taxes; etc. - are matters of prudential judgment. Two people can disagree on matters of prudential judgment and both still be in line with Church teaching.
Principle: A candidate’s position with respect to matters that pertain to prudential judgments about immigration reform, healthcare, the economy, and care and concern for the poor, do not hold the same moral equivalence as a candidate’s positions on intrinsic evils such as abortion and same-sex “marriage.” Two people cannot disagree on matters of intrinsic evil and both still be in line with Church teaching.
Principle: If a candidate gets it "right" in your eyes on matters of prudential judgment vs. their opponent; but is wrong on matters of intrinsic evil vs. their opponent; then the matters of prudential judgment cannot "make up" for being wrong on matters of intrinsic evil.
So, those are a few principles that Catholics need to take into consideration when stepping into the voting booth. I will close with a couple of questions for those who would support someone who is a staunch supporter of abortion and abortion “rights,” not because you agree with their position on abortion, but because you agree with one or more of their other positions regarding government, taxation, welfare, education, the economy, and so on, and you think their positions on these issues outweigh their position on abortion. If you are one such person, please consider these questions carefully:
Let’s say that the candidate you are voting for, instead of being a staunch supporter of abortion, and a supporter of the laws that allow for the killing of more than one million unborn babies each year, let’s say that instead of supporting abortion, that candidate was a staunch supporter of laws that allowed for the lynching of one million black men a year. Could you still vote for that candidate? Would their position on healthcare or education or immigration outweigh their position on lynching?
Or, let’s say, instead of supporting abortion, that candidate was a staunch supporter of laws that allowed for the gassing of one million Jews a year. Could you still vote for that candidate? Would their position on healthcare or education or immigration outweigh their position on gassing Jews?
Let’s be honest...you answered a strong, resounding, “NO!!!” to each of those questions, didn’t you? You could not and would not vote for a candidate who supported the lynching of even one black man, much less one million black men, no matter how “right” he or she was on the other issues. You could not and would not vote for a candidate who supported the gassing of even one Jew, much less one million Jews, no matter how right he or she was on the other issues.
How, then, can one vote for a candidate who supports abortion “rights” and who supports laws that allow for the killing of over one million unborn children a year?! The only way one can do that is if they do not believe the unborn child is a human being deserving of full protection under the law. The only way one can do that is by devaluing the life of the unborn child.
It is not my job here to tell anyone who they should vote for, but it is my job to let folks know what they need to consider when voting. Now, there are some who will say that the questions I posed above are a bit harsh. Well, I agree. But, before anyone emails me or calls me, please look at a picture of an aborted baby (you can find such pictures by doing a quick search on the internet) and consider if anything I’ve written is harsher than what happened to that baby.
Closing Comments
Please pray for our country, and particularly for these upcoming elections - that we can get the leaders we need at the local, state, and national levels, as opposed to the leaders we deserve. Our culture has become a sewer - abortion, contraception, same-sex "marriage," men able to use women's bathrooms, transexualism, euthanasia and now, I just read a story about the conception of the first "3 parent" embryo. A baby with 3 parents. We are trying to play God, and God doesn't ever take too kindly to that. There are some demons that can only be expelled through prayer and fasting...Donations
The Bible Christian Society is a non-profit organization that relies solely on your support to bring the truths of the Catholic Faith to tens of thousands of people throughout the U.S. and all around the world each year. If you would like to help us do what we do, you can donate online at: http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/donations, or send a check to: Bible Christian Society, PO Box 424, Pleasant Grove, AL 35127 . Anything you can do is greatly appreciated!Sunday, October 09, 2016
CLUMP: WHAT THE DEATH THROES OF A CIVILIZATION LOOKS LIKE.
Exhibt A: A sociopathic liar, fraud, criminal, and sexual pervert who wants to rule over you.
Private Clinton speeches to Wall Street bankers leaked in hacking ... - UK Telegraph
Private Clinton speeches to Wall Street bankers leaked in hacking ... - UK Telegraph
The leaks were the result of another email hacking intended to influence the presidential election.
Excerpts of the speeches given in the years before her 2016 presidential campaign included some blunt and unguarded remarks to her private audiences, which collectively had paid her at least $26.1 million in speaking fees. Clinton had refused to release transcripts of the speeches, despite repeated calls to do so by her primary opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The excerpts were included in emails exchanged among her political staff, including Campaign Chairman John Podesta, whose email account was hacked. The WikiLeaks organisation posted what it said were thousands of Podesta's emails. It wasn't immediately clear who had hacked Podesta's emails, though the breach appeared to cover years of messages, some sent as recently as last month.
Among the emails was a compilation of excerpts from Clinton's paid speeches in 2013 and 2014. It appeared campaign staff had read all Clinton's speeches and identified passages that could be potentially problematic for the candidate if they were to become public.
One excerpt put Clinton squarely in the free-trade camp, a position she has retreated on significantly during the 2016 election. In a talk to a Brazilian bank in 2013, she said her "dream" is "a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders" and asked her audience to think of what doubling American trade with Latin America "would mean for everybody in this room."
Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, has made opposition to trade deals a cornerstone of his campaign.
Podesta posted a series of tweets Friday night, calling the disclosures a Russian hack and raising questions about whether some of the documents could have been altered.
"I'm not happy about being hacked by the Russians in their quest to throw the election to Donald Trump," Podesta wrote. "Don't have time to figure out which docs are real and which are faked."
Podesta's comments came just hours after U.S. officials publicly accused the Russian government of directing cyberattacks on political organisations and American citizens in an attempt to interfere with U.S. elections.
The joint statement from the office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Homeland Security Department cited disclosures of "alleged hacked emails" on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks as being "consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts."
The statement didn't refer by name to the affected political institutions, but federal authorities are investigating cyberattacks on the computer systems of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement, "It's not hard to see why she fought so hard to keep her transcripts of speeches to Wall Street banks paying her millions of dollars secret."
The emails released Friday included exchanges between Podesta and other Clinton insiders, including campaign manager Robby Mook. Most were routine, including drafts of Clinton speeches, suggested talking points for campaign surrogates and suggested tweets to be sent out from Clinton's account.
The excerpts include quotes from an October 2013 speech at an event sponsored by Goldman Sachs, in which Clinton conceded that presidential candidates need the financial backing of Wall Street to mount a competitive national campaign.
"Running for office in our country takes a lot of money, and candidates have to go out and raise it," Clinton said. "New York is probably the leading site for contributions for fundraising for candidates on both sides of the aisle, and it's also our economic centre. And there are a lot of people here who should ask some tough questions before handing over campaign contributions to people who were really playing chicken with our whole economy."
In the same speech, Clinton was also deferential to the New York finance industry, exhorting wealthy donors to use their political clout for patriotic rather than personal benefit. She also spoke of the need to include Wall Street perspectives in financial reform.
"The people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry," Clinton said.
In an April 2013 speech to the National Multifamily Housing Council, Clinton said politicians must balance "both a public and a private position" while making deals. Clinton gave an example from the movie "Lincoln," and the deal-making that went into passage of the 13th Amendment, a process she compared to sausage-making.
"It is unsavoury, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be," Clinton said. "But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position."
Clinton's speeches often touched on technology and privacy. In an April 2014 speech to JPMorgan, she denounced National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden for going abroad, saying, "if he really cared about raising some of these issues and stayed right here in the United States, there's a lot of whistleblower protections."
But she told her audience that her time in the public eye left her sympathetic to privacy concerns.
"As somebody who has had my privacy scrutinised and violated for decades, I'm all for privacy, believe me," she said.
Speaking on international affairs, Clinton's comments were largely in line with her positions as secretary of state, if sometimes more blunt.
"The Saudis have exported more extreme ideology than any other place on Earth over the course of the last 30 years," she told the Jewish United Fund at a 2013 dinner.
The speech transcripts were produced under an agreement Clinton routinely imposed on any organisation that hired her to speak. The contracts, such as ones crafted by the Harry Walker Agency, required the organisations to hire, at their own expense, a stenographer who would provide the transcripts to Clinton and not keep copies for themselves.
In some cases, the contracts themselves were obtained by news organisations under public records laws because Clinton was being paid to speak by public universities or colleges.
Exhibit B: A sociopathic liar, .fraud, criminal, and sexual pervert who wants to rule over you.
Among the emails was a compilation of excerpts from Clinton's paid speeches in 2013 and 2014. It appeared campaign staff had read all Clinton's speeches and identified passages that could be potentially problematic for the candidate if they were to become public.
One excerpt put Clinton squarely in the free-trade camp, a position she has retreated on significantly during the 2016 election. In a talk to a Brazilian bank in 2013, she said her "dream" is "a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders" and asked her audience to think of what doubling American trade with Latin America "would mean for everybody in this room."
Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, has made opposition to trade deals a cornerstone of his campaign.
Podesta posted a series of tweets Friday night, calling the disclosures a Russian hack and raising questions about whether some of the documents could have been altered.
"I'm not happy about being hacked by the Russians in their quest to throw the election to Donald Trump," Podesta wrote. "Don't have time to figure out which docs are real and which are faked."
Podesta's comments came just hours after U.S. officials publicly accused the Russian government of directing cyberattacks on political organisations and American citizens in an attempt to interfere with U.S. elections.
The joint statement from the office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Homeland Security Department cited disclosures of "alleged hacked emails" on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks as being "consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts."
The statement didn't refer by name to the affected political institutions, but federal authorities are investigating cyberattacks on the computer systems of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement, "It's not hard to see why she fought so hard to keep her transcripts of speeches to Wall Street banks paying her millions of dollars secret."
The emails released Friday included exchanges between Podesta and other Clinton insiders, including campaign manager Robby Mook. Most were routine, including drafts of Clinton speeches, suggested talking points for campaign surrogates and suggested tweets to be sent out from Clinton's account.
The excerpts include quotes from an October 2013 speech at an event sponsored by Goldman Sachs, in which Clinton conceded that presidential candidates need the financial backing of Wall Street to mount a competitive national campaign.
"Running for office in our country takes a lot of money, and candidates have to go out and raise it," Clinton said. "New York is probably the leading site for contributions for fundraising for candidates on both sides of the aisle, and it's also our economic centre. And there are a lot of people here who should ask some tough questions before handing over campaign contributions to people who were really playing chicken with our whole economy."
In the same speech, Clinton was also deferential to the New York finance industry, exhorting wealthy donors to use their political clout for patriotic rather than personal benefit. She also spoke of the need to include Wall Street perspectives in financial reform.
"The people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry," Clinton said.
In an April 2013 speech to the National Multifamily Housing Council, Clinton said politicians must balance "both a public and a private position" while making deals. Clinton gave an example from the movie "Lincoln," and the deal-making that went into passage of the 13th Amendment, a process she compared to sausage-making.
"It is unsavoury, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be," Clinton said. "But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position."
Clinton's speeches often touched on technology and privacy. In an April 2014 speech to JPMorgan, she denounced National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden for going abroad, saying, "if he really cared about raising some of these issues and stayed right here in the United States, there's a lot of whistleblower protections."
But she told her audience that her time in the public eye left her sympathetic to privacy concerns.
"As somebody who has had my privacy scrutinised and violated for decades, I'm all for privacy, believe me," she said.
Speaking on international affairs, Clinton's comments were largely in line with her positions as secretary of state, if sometimes more blunt.
"The Saudis have exported more extreme ideology than any other place on Earth over the course of the last 30 years," she told the Jewish United Fund at a 2013 dinner.
The speech transcripts were produced under an agreement Clinton routinely imposed on any organisation that hired her to speak. The contracts, such as ones crafted by the Harry Walker Agency, required the organisations to hire, at their own expense, a stenographer who would provide the transcripts to Clinton and not keep copies for themselves.
In some cases, the contracts themselves were obtained by news organisations under public records laws because Clinton was being paid to speak by public universities or colleges.
Exhibit B: A sociopathic liar, .fraud, criminal, and sexual pervert who wants to rule over you.
Transcript: Donald Trump's Taped Comments About Women - The Old Gray Whore
Following is an unedited transcript of the tape in which Donald J. Trump repeatedly made vulgar comments about women. Mr. Trump was filmed talking to the television personality Billy Bush of “Access Hollywood” on the set of “Days of Our Lives,” where Mr. Trump was making a cameo appearance. They are later joined by the actress Arianne Zucker. The transcription is by Penn Bullock of The New York Times.
Donald J. Trump: You know and ...
Unknown: She used to be great. She’s still very beautiful.
Trump: I moved on her, actually. You know, she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it.
Unknown: Whoa.
Trump: I did try and fuck her. She was married.
Unknown: That’s huge news.
Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.
She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —
I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.
Billy Bush: Sheesh, your girl’s hot as shit. In the purple.
Trump: Whoa! Whoa!
Bush: Yes! The Donald has scored. Whoa, my man!
[Crosstalk]
Trump: Look at you, you are a pussy.
[Crosstalk]
Trump: All right, you and I will walk out.
[Silence]
Trump: Maybe it’s a different one.
Bush: It better not be the publicist. No, it’s, it’s her, it’s —
Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Bush: Whatever you want.
Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
Bush: Uh, yeah, those legs, all I can see is the legs.
Trump: Oh, it looks good.
Bush: Come on shorty.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?
Bush: Oof, get out of the way, honey. Oh, that’s good legs. Go ahead.
Trump: It’s always good if you don’t fall out of the bus. Like Ford, Gerald Ford, remember?
Bush: Down below, pull the handle.
Trump: Hello, how are you? Hi!
Arianne Zucker: Hi, Mr. Trump. How are you? Pleasure to meet you.
Trump: Nice seeing you. Terrific, terrific. You know Billy Bush?
Bush: Hello, nice to see you. How you doing, Arianne?
Zucker: Doing very well, thank you. Are you ready to be a soap star?
Bush: How about a little hug for the Donald? He just got off the bus.
Zucker: Would you like a little hug, darling?
Trump: O.K., absolutely. Melania said this was O.K.
Bush: How about a little hug for the Bushy? I just got off the bus.
Zucker: Bushy, Bushy.
Bush: Here we go. Excellent. Well, you’ve got a nice co-star here.
Zucker: Yes, absolutely.
Trump: Good. After you.
[Break in video]
Trump: Come on, Billy, don’t be shy.
Bush: Soon as a beautiful woman shows up, he just, he takes off. This always happens.
Trump: Get over here, Billy.
Zucker: I’m sorry, come here.
Bush: Let the little guy in here, come on.
Zucker: Yeah, let the little guy in. How you feel now? Better? I should actually be in the middle.
Bush: It’s hard to walk next to a guy like this.
Zucker: Here, wait, hold on.
Bush: Yeah, you get in the middle, there we go.
Trump: Good, that’s better.
Zucker
: This is much better.
Donald J. Trump: You know and ...
Unknown: She used to be great. She’s still very beautiful.
Trump: I moved on her, actually. You know, she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it.
Unknown: Whoa.
Trump: I did try and fuck her. She was married.
Unknown: That’s huge news.
Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.
She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —
I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.
Trump: Whoa! Whoa!
Bush: Yes! The Donald has scored. Whoa, my man!
[Crosstalk]
Trump: Look at you, you are a pussy.
[Crosstalk]
Trump: All right, you and I will walk out.
[Silence]
Trump: Maybe it’s a different one.
Bush: It better not be the publicist. No, it’s, it’s her, it’s —
Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Bush: Whatever you want.
Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
Bush: Uh, yeah, those legs, all I can see is the legs.
Trump: Oh, it looks good.
Bush: Come on shorty.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?
Bush: Oof, get out of the way, honey. Oh, that’s good legs. Go ahead.
Trump: It’s always good if you don’t fall out of the bus. Like Ford, Gerald Ford, remember?
Bush: Down below, pull the handle.
Trump: Hello, how are you? Hi!
Arianne Zucker: Hi, Mr. Trump. How are you? Pleasure to meet you.
Trump: Nice seeing you. Terrific, terrific. You know Billy Bush?
Zucker: Doing very well, thank you. Are you ready to be a soap star?
Trump: We’re ready, let’s go. Make me a soap star.
Bush: How about a little hug for the Donald? He just got off the bus.
Zucker: Would you like a little hug, darling?
Trump: O.K., absolutely. Melania said this was O.K.
Bush: How about a little hug for the Bushy? I just got off the bus.
Zucker: Bushy, Bushy.
Bush: Here we go. Excellent. Well, you’ve got a nice co-star here.
Zucker: Yes, absolutely.
Trump: Good. After you.
[Break in video]
Trump: Come on, Billy, don’t be shy.
Bush: Soon as a beautiful woman shows up, he just, he takes off. This always happens.
Trump: Get over here, Billy.
Zucker: I’m sorry, come here.
Bush: Let the little guy in here, come on.
Zucker: Yeah, let the little guy in. How you feel now? Better? I should actually be in the middle.
Bush: It’s hard to walk next to a guy like this.
Zucker: Here, wait, hold on.
Bush: Yeah, you get in the middle, there we go.
Trump: Good, that’s better.
Zucker: This is much better. This is —
Trump: That’s better.
Zucker: [Sighs]
Bush: Now, if you had to choose honestly between one of us. Me or the Donald?
Zucker: That’s some pressure right there.
Bush: Seriously, if you had — if you had to take one of us as a date.
Zucker: I have to take the Fifth on that one.
Bush: Really?
Zucker: Yup — I’ll take both.
Trump: Which way?
Zucker: Make a right. Here we go. [inaudible]
Bush: Here he goes. I’m gonna leave you here.
Trump: O.K.
Bush: Give me my microphone.
Trump: O.K. Oh, you’re finished?
Bush: You’re my man, yeah.
Trump: Oh, good.
Bush: I’m gonna go do our show.
Zucker: Oh, you wanna reset? O.K
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- TheChurchMilitant
- First of all, the word is SEX, not GENDER. If you are ever tempted to use the word GENDER, don't. The word is SEX! SEX! SEX! SEX! For example: "My sex is male." is correct. "My gender is male." means nothing. Look it up. What kind of sick neo-Puritan nonsense is this? Idiot left-fascists, get your blood-soaked paws off the English language. Hence I am choosing "male" under protest.