Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Yet another war designed for us not to win.


From CBS:

Obama: Qaddafi must go, but current Libya mission focused on humanitarian efforts
President Obama said today that U.S. military involvement in Libya remains limited, even as U.S. policy calls for Qaddafi to go...


It's simple kiddies. To win a war you must destroy your enemy's ability and will to continue the fight. The best, quickest, safest, and cheapest way to do this is to kill your enemy's leader(s) and break his armed forces' will to fight. But we haven't fought to win since 1945. [No, I haven't forgotten Iraq. Watch what happens there when we leave.]

Benito Insane Okhrana is a pansy. And not the good I-need-to-find-an-interior-decorator kind. He's the kind who gets more guys killed than necessary. [Yes, I said necessary. Few people deserve a laser-guided thousand pound Candygram more than that Libyan goat raper.]


From MSNBC:

Obama, Libya and the authorization conflict
Barack Obama’s stance on U.S. action in Libya is striking: not only hasn’t he addressed the question of congressional authorization, but acting without it appears to be at odds with what he stood for when he ran for president.

Hee-hee. Kucinich "cares" about the constitution.

Oops! Guess not...

Kucinich critique turns into push for funds

Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich is transforming his critique of President Obama's actions in Libya into a fundraising plea, asking supporters to decide whether they like President Obama or the Constitution more. After calling the president's decision to act in Libya an "impeachable offense," Kucinich Monday posted a letter on his website asking supporters for help in "putting together a broad fundraising structure to make sure that I'll have the resources to continue to be a voice in the Unites States Congress."
- CNN Political Ticker


No comments:

Post a Comment